Quantcast

Court rules in favor of Puerto Rico police bureau employees over withheld health benefits

Qantas’ free international Wi-Fi to switch on from next week
The real reason Southwest is charging for bags now
Air France-KLM in ongoing talks with Air Europa on potential stake, CEO says
Frontier Savagely Shades Southwest After They Eliminated Longstanding Free Bag Policy, Sparking Backlash
Frontier Wants You to 'Divorce Your Old Airline' After Southwest Changes
Delta named one of Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies for sustainability initiatives
Passengers escape fiery American Airlines jet in Denver
Delta, American Dive On Slashed Outlooks; But Two Airlines Rally
Competitors are circling Southwest after the airline announced it's going to start charging for checked bags
Exclusive: Dominican Low-Cost Carrier Arajet Wants to Disrupt NYC Market
Boeing deliveries rise 63% in February from a year earlier
Transportation Secretary Duffy Lays Out 10 Ways the FAA Is Working to Upgrade Air Traffic Control and Make Flying Safer
EasyJet pilot Paul Elsworth suspended after flying too close to mountain
Delta Air Lines bets on ‘blended-wing’ flight to reduce emissions
Europe's airlines pivot to bite size M&A deals to limit cost, regulatory burden
Dave Emerson named new CEO of Virgin Australia, replacing Jayne Hrdlicka
Ryanair DELAYS controversial new boarding pass rule to avoid summer chaos
FAA Orders Inspection, Replacement of 737NG Engine Parts
Spirit Adds New Airport, Three Routes
Delta crash passengers should take the $30,000 payment, their lawyers say. Here’s why.
Budget airline launches new cheap flights to one of the UK’s top winter sun destinations
Brazilian airline Azul to go 'back to basics' after challenging 2024
Airlines cancel flights as air travel to ‘grind to complete halt’ this week ahead of major strike action in Europe
Dramatic moment American Airlines plane diverted to Rome is escorted by fighter jets after mid-air bomb threat
Jetstar Faces Major Backlash as Nationwide System Outage Causes Travel Chaos, Stranding Passengers and Disrupting Flights Across the Australian Airline Industry
Sudden oil supply outages creating turbulence for airline industry
Southwest's layoffs dent its worker-first culture
Abu Dhabi's long-haul carrier Etihad Airways sees record $476 million profit in 2024
Jet2 warns of profits squeeze from rising costs and late bookings
Southwest bends further to activist shareholder Elliott's demands
Court rules in favor of Puerto Rico police bureau employees over withheld health benefits
Webp 7m51snljqm28hzqem7292tro8g1t
Angel J. Valencia | Staff Attorney (2018-Present) | NRTWLD&EF, Inc

Eleven civilian employees of the Puerto Rico Police Bureau (PRPB) have secured a favorable ruling in their federal class action lawsuit against both their employer and the Union of Organized Civilian Employees. The lawsuit accused these entities of illegally discriminating by removing an employer-provided health benefit from employees who chose not to join the union. These employees argued that this action violated their First Amendment rights to abstain from unwanted union affiliation, receiving legal support from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation attorneys.

The plaintiffs, Vanessa Carbonell, Roberto Whatts Osorio, Elba Colon Nery, Billy Nieves Hernandez, Nelida Alvarez Febus, Linda Dumont Guzman, Sandra Quinones Pinto, Yomarys Ortiz Gonzalez, Janet Cruz Berrios, Carmen Berlingeri Pabon, and Merab Ortiz Rivera filed the lawsuit in 2022 at the U.S. District Court of Puerto Rico. They based their case on the 2018 Supreme Court decision in Janus v. AFSCME. In that decision, it was ruled that compelling public employees to join or fund a union violates the First Amendment and that union dues can only be taken if an employee waives this right.

On September 19th, the District Court sided with the plaintiffs. It found that PRPB had indeed removed a health benefit after these employees exercised their Janus right not to join or pay dues to the Union of Organized Civilian Employees. “This is either retaliation for exercise of non-union members’ post-Janus non-associational rights under the First Amendment under the Constitution or simply discrimination,” said the Court.

Get the Newsletter
Sign-up to receive weekly round up of news from Sky Industry News
By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. By providing your phone number you are opting in and consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from our short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

“The [PRPB] may neither retaliate for disassociation or non-support of the public sector union nor can it adopt — or as here interpret — a [union contract] in a manner that permits discrimination against non-union members,” continued the Court.

According to the original lawsuit filed by plaintiffs, they opted out of union membership at various points following the 2018 Janus decision and subsequently noticed that they stopped receiving a $25-a-month employer-paid benefit meant for health insurance as soon as union dues ceased being deducted from their paychecks.

“[T]he Union, through its president Jorge Méndez Cotto asked PRPB to stop awarding the $25 monthly additional employer contribution to any bargaining unit member who objected to [forced] membership…,” stated their complaint.

“Plaintiffs are ready, willing, and able to purchase additional and higher quality health insurance benefits with the additional employer contribution that is being denied to them,” read another part of their complaint. “But for the above-described discriminatory policy they would purchase better quality health insurance.”

The District Court's decision also includes an injunction ordering PRPB officials to cease withholding this benefit from Carbonell and other affected employees.

Commenting on this outcome National Right to Work Foundation President Mark Mix stated: “Janus enshrined a very simple principle: That union officials need to convince public employees to support their organization and activities voluntarily and using government power to force such support is an obvious infringement of First Amendment free association principles.” He added: “Diminishing Ms. Carbonell and her coworkers’ access to healthcare just because they disagreed with the union’s agenda is a heinous violation of that principle and Foundation attorneys were happy to assist them in their victory over that scheme.”

More News

Delta Air Lines has introduced a new series of trading cards featuring Centennial colors and branding as part of its 100th-anniversary celebrations.

Mar 28, 2025

The US Space Force has raised concerns about China's activities in space, suggesting that the country is developing its satellite maneuverability to a point where it could engage in "dogfighting" tactics.

Mar 28, 2025

Frontier Airlines is expanding its network with the introduction of three new routes from San Diego International Airport (SAN).

Mar 28, 2025

Alaska Airlines may soon join the joint venture between Japan Airlines and American Airlines.

Mar 28, 2025

Flying Food Group (FFG) has announced its participation in the United Nations Global Compact, aiming to align with international sustainability goals.

Mar 28, 2025

David Cotton, CEO of Flying Food Group, said that the company is committed to sustainability and is "implementing innovative solutions to reduce our environmental footprint."

Mar 28, 2025