Pros and cons of choosing between single or multi-engine jets

In terms of safety, multi-engine planes can continue flying with one engine in case of failure. However, managing asymmetrical thrust requires advanced piloting skills. Single-engine planes necessitate emergency landings if their sole engine fails.

Cost-wise, single-engine jets are more affordable to purchase and maintain compared to their multi-engine counterparts which consume more fuel and have higher operational expenses.

An emerging alternative is the single-engine turboprop like the Daher-Socata TBM series or Pilatus PC-12. These combine low operating costs with high performance but offer smaller cabins compared to traditional multi-engine jets.

Regarding engine types, turbine engines are generally more reliable than piston engines. "We could... say that multi-engine piston aircraft are safer than single-engine piston aircraft," depending on pilot experience.

Ultimately, single-engine aircraft are cost-effective for flight schools and leisure travel while multi-engines cater to luxury travel needs over long distances. Single-engine turboprops present a viable middle ground with reduced costs yet enhanced performance capabilities.