Quantcast

Starbucks baristas challenge constitutionality of NLRB in federal appeals court

Starbucks baristas challenge constitutionality of NLRB in federal appeals court
Webp 049mufsipw2uvrj2bt3je9d93anm
William L. Messenger Vice President and Legal Director (2023-Present) | NRTWLD&EF, Inc

Today, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia heard oral arguments in a significant case involving Starbucks employees from New York. The case, Cortes v. NLRB, questions the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Baristas Ariana Cortes and Logan Karam are represented by attorneys from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.

The lawsuit was initiated in 2023 and is notable for being the first to argue that protections against removing NLRB board members violate Article II of the Constitution's separation of powers doctrines. Since then, similar arguments have been made by the Trump Administration regarding Biden NLRB Member Gwynne Wilcox's removal, which is currently under litigation.

Mark Mix, President of the National Right to Work Foundation, commented on today's proceedings: "Ms. Cortes and Mr. Karam stand up for untold numbers of workers around the country in their battle to reform the NLRB."

Get the Newsletter
Sign-up to receive weekly round up of news from Sky Industry News
By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. By providing your phone number you are opting in and consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from our short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

Tomorrow, May 16, the D.C. Circuit Court will hear another related case, Wilcox v. Trump.

The federal case filed by Starbucks baristas followed actions taken by Biden's NLRB that were perceived as disenfranchising workers. On April 28, 2023, Cortes requested a decertification election at her Buffalo-area Starbucks store after gaining support from her colleagues to remove SBWU union officials' bargaining powers. However, this petition was rejected due to unfair labor practice accusations against Starbucks Corporation made by SBWU union officials.

Similarly, Karam's attempt to initiate a decertification vote at his store faced rejection based on claims by SBWU officials. Consequently, both workers remain under union representation they oppose and have pursued legal action challenging the structure of the NLRB as unconstitutional.

More News

Flying privately from New York to London offers unparalleled flexibility and convenience, allowing travelers to choose departure times and airports according to their preferences.

May 19, 2025

British Airways has been fined $4.2 million following two incidents where baggage handlers were injured at London Heathrow Airport.

May 19, 2025

TAP Air Portugal has expanded its network in the United States by launching two new routes.

May 19, 2025

Etihad Airways has announced an order for 28 Boeing widebody aircraft, totaling nearly $14.5 billion, including agreements with engine supplier GE Aerospace.

May 19, 2025

Emirates has unveiled a unique livery for one of its Airbus A380 aircraft, marking a significant step in the evolution of its 'Courier Express' service.

May 19, 2025

Boom Supersonic is seeking to overturn a longstanding US ban on overland supersonic flights, which has been in place since 1973 due to noise concerns from sonic booms.

May 19, 2025