Comparisons with other major aircraft programs highlight the scale of the delay. For instance, Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner was delayed by about three years; Airbus’s A380 faced a delay of up to two years; but the 777X is now running six or more years behind its original target entry into service date—initially set for 2020 and now expected in 2026 or possibly later.
The situation has been complicated further by heightened regulatory scrutiny following incidents involving Boeing’s 737 MAX program. “Boeing is behind schedule and that a 'mountain of work' remains before the FAA can grant certification,” said CEO Kelly Ortberg. He added that while no new technical flaws have been found recently, completing all required documentation, tests, and validations is a significant challenge.
Regulators are now imposing stricter oversight requirements than in previous years. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) demands more rigorous testing protocols and insists on independent test pilots participating in evaluations. This environment reduces Boeing's flexibility to address minor issues after initial approvals.
Additional technical problems have also contributed to delays. In August 2024, structural cracks were discovered in engine-mounting hardware during stress tests. This resulted in grounding test aircraft until January 2025. Other issues such as uncommanded pitch behavior during flight trials have required further investigation.
Supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures have also slowed progress on the program. Quality control concerns across vendors became more prominent after high-profile lapses elsewhere within Boeing’s operations.
The financial implications for Boeing are considerable. Delays increase costs because development expenses cannot be spread over early deliveries as planned. Some analysts warn that another year’s delay could add $2.5 billion to $4 billion in charges against company earnings if entry into service slips into 2027.
Airlines that placed early orders—including Lufthansa (the launch customer), Emirates, and Qatar Airways—have expressed frustration over continued setbacks. Some carriers have adjusted their fleet strategies or removed the 777X from short-term plans due to uncertainty around delivery dates.
If further delays occur beyond 2026, airlines may seek compensation or defer orders entirely while continuing to operate older aircraft models longer than intended. This impacts their ability to modernize fleets for improved efficiency or environmental goals.
For Boeing itself, ongoing investment in resolving issues with the 777X limits resources available for other projects such as potential new aircraft designs or updates to existing lines like the 787 series. Meanwhile, competitor Airbus may strengthen its market position with alternatives such as the A350-1000 if current trends continue.
Industry observers note that how Boeing manages this critical period will shape perceptions of its reliability among regulators and customers alike: “If Boeing successfully delivers the aircraft by 2026–27, it will still enter service as the most technologically advanced twin-engine widebody in history... However, if delays persist, the 777X could be remembered as the jet that marked a permanent turning point in Boeing’s dominance.”
The next two years are expected to be decisive both for completion of certification efforts and for restoring confidence among stakeholders who depend on timely introduction of new technologies within commercial aviation.
Alerts Sign-up
