Quantcast

Dallas Mudd challenges NLRB structure with foundation-backed lawsuit

Dallas Mudd challenges NLRB structure with foundation-backed lawsuit
Webp 049mufsipw2uvrj2bt3je9d93anm
William L. Messenger Vice President and Legal Director (2023-Present) | NRTWLD&EF, Inc

In November, Dallas Mudd, an employee at the online social service coordination platform Findhelp, initiated a federal lawsuit against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), challenging its constitutionality. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas and is part of a broader legal campaign by the National Right to Work Foundation.

Mudd's legal action followed his attempt to decertify the Office & Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU) from his workplace. His petition for a vote was blocked by NLRB officials based on unverified charges made by union leaders against Findhelp. In response, Mudd appealed to the full NLRB in Washington, D.C., while simultaneously filing a federal lawsuit questioning the removal protections of NLRB members.

A request for a preliminary injunction was also submitted by Mudd's attorney to halt NLRB proceedings on his appeal until the constitutional issues are addressed. He claims ongoing harm from engaging with an agency he believes is structured unconstitutionally.

Get the Newsletter
Sign-up to receive weekly round up of news from Sky Industry News
By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. By providing your phone number you are opting in and consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from our short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

This lawsuit is one among five backed by the National Right to Work Foundation targeting NLRB's structure. A similar case involves New York Starbucks employees Ariana Cortes and Logan Karam, whose challenge against NLRB Board Member protections is under review at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Foundation argues that many major employers have adopted these constitutional arguments against what they term as a pro-union bias within the Biden-Harris administration’s NLRB.

Patrick Semmens, Vice President of the National Right to Work Foundation, stated: "Independent-minded workers should not be forced to depend on biased agencies staffed by bureaucrats who exercise power in violation of the Constitution."

He further emphasized that "the Constitution does not permit a powerful federal agency to operate as judge, jury, and executioner without proper oversight," adding that "federal labor law is not exempt from the requirements of the U.S. Constitution."

Findhelp has already secured an injunction against similar actions from NLRB in its own case presented in federal district court.

More News

Seeking Alpha has reported a concerning development for Embraer following US President Donald Trump's threat to impose a 50% tariff on all imported Brazilian goods.

Jul 15, 2025

Cirium Diio data reveals that the United States is seeing 6,335 departing long-haul international flights this week, averaging 905 takeoffs daily.

Jul 15, 2025

After flying back to Frankfurt Airport with Lufthansa, a review was conducted of the Star Alliance Lounge at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport.

Jul 15, 2025

The Airbus A380, a prominent figure in the aviation world, is known for its massive size and four-engine configuration.

Jul 15, 2025

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released its final report on the Alaska Airlines mid-air door plug blowout involving a Boeing 737 MAX 9 in January 2024.

Jul 15, 2025

Air China, Korean Air, and Lufthansa continue to operate Boeing 747 passenger flights to the United States.

Jul 15, 2025