Quantcast

Dallas Mudd challenges NLRB structure with foundation-backed lawsuit

Dallas Mudd challenges NLRB structure with foundation-backed lawsuit
Webp 049mufsipw2uvrj2bt3je9d93anm
William L. Messenger Vice President and Legal Director (2023-Present) | NRTWLD&EF, Inc

In November, Dallas Mudd, an employee at the online social service coordination platform Findhelp, initiated a federal lawsuit against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), challenging its constitutionality. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas and is part of a broader legal campaign by the National Right to Work Foundation.

Mudd's legal action followed his attempt to decertify the Office & Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU) from his workplace. His petition for a vote was blocked by NLRB officials based on unverified charges made by union leaders against Findhelp. In response, Mudd appealed to the full NLRB in Washington, D.C., while simultaneously filing a federal lawsuit questioning the removal protections of NLRB members.

A request for a preliminary injunction was also submitted by Mudd's attorney to halt NLRB proceedings on his appeal until the constitutional issues are addressed. He claims ongoing harm from engaging with an agency he believes is structured unconstitutionally.

Get the Newsletter
Sign-up to receive weekly round up of news from Sky Industry News
By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. By providing your phone number you are opting in and consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from our short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

This lawsuit is one among five backed by the National Right to Work Foundation targeting NLRB's structure. A similar case involves New York Starbucks employees Ariana Cortes and Logan Karam, whose challenge against NLRB Board Member protections is under review at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Foundation argues that many major employers have adopted these constitutional arguments against what they term as a pro-union bias within the Biden-Harris administration’s NLRB.

Patrick Semmens, Vice President of the National Right to Work Foundation, stated: "Independent-minded workers should not be forced to depend on biased agencies staffed by bureaucrats who exercise power in violation of the Constitution."

He further emphasized that "the Constitution does not permit a powerful federal agency to operate as judge, jury, and executioner without proper oversight," adding that "federal labor law is not exempt from the requirements of the U.S. Constitution."

Findhelp has already secured an injunction against similar actions from NLRB in its own case presented in federal district court.

More News

Boeing’s X-37B unmanned spaceplane is preparing for its eighth mission, following a 434-day flight that concluded in March 2025.

Aug 5, 2025

JetBlue reported an operating profit of $6 million for the second quarter of 2025, according to its latest financial results.

Aug 5, 2025

On July 26, 2025, law enforcement officers arrested Delta Air Lines first officer Rustom Bhagwagar upon arrival at San Francisco International Airport.

Aug 5, 2025

Dubai International Airport (DXB) recorded its highest-ever passenger traffic for the first half of a year, with 46 million travelers passing through from January to June 2025.

Aug 5, 2025

Allegiant Air has announced the addition of seven new nonstop routes across 12 cities, with service set to begin in mid-November 2025.

Aug 5, 2025

Delta Air Lines is set to introduce a new security protocol this week at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL), aiming to reduce the time international travelers spend during connections.

Aug 5, 2025